It was the eerie silence that permeated the room that first drew my attention to the issue of free expression in Egypt, something that I had taken advantage of in the United States my entire life. Three years ago I and a few other American students were sitting in a small room in Cairo with a group of young Egyptian students, exchanging thoughts and questions about our respective countries. We, the American students, were studying abroad in Egypt in what our university called a “Dialogue of Civilizations”, which focused on language study and cultural immersion.
One of the American students had rather innocently asked what the Egyptian students thought of their President Hosni Mubarak. The question provoked a nervous exchange of glances, a prolonged silence, followed by an eagerness amongst the Egyptian students to change the subject. I was surprised by this level of fear that Egyptians felt when the subject of their president and political oppression was addressed. I was inspired by this series of events to look at what tools the young people, both political and apolitical, are using to express their viewpoints and speak out against oppression.
Fast forward three years. These past couple of weeks I have been observing the uprising in Egypt with utter awe. The response from the Western world has been that of support for the bravery and determination of the Egyptian people in their fight for democracy, as well as the predictable fear-mongering from armchair observers, politicians, and others, about an Islamic theocratic takeover of Egypt should Mubarak step down immediately. There is little of the usual indifference towards the outside world.
The biggest obstacle to real change seems to be a general indifference amongst the international community and a general misunderstanding of young people in the Middle East. With this in mind it is understandable that many people in Egypt do not believe that America truly cares about freedom or democracy in the Middle East because the U.S. administration has failed to put pressure on authoritarian regimes that engage in strict censorship. But with the exposure of injustices against Egyptians that has been shown to the wider world, pressure can be put on governments such as the U.S. to push for real reform.
I found it disheartening that some of those who are often so quick to wave the torch of freedom and democracy are so quick to resort to skepticism and even down right nasty rhetoric when it concerns “Arabs” and “Muslims".
Individuals, who before last week had never even heard of the Muslim Brotherhood, are now busy conjuring up apocalyptic scenarios of an Islamo-fascist caliphate taking over Egypt or otherwise making poorly thought out comparisons to what happened in Iran following the 1979 revolution.
There seems to be very little effort to look at history beyond a specific date or historic moment. Moreover there seems to be little concern or understanding of the political and social environment that contributed to the Iranian revolution as well as the not so beloved theocracy that replaced the Shah. Many Americans seem unaware that in 1951 Iranians freely elected a progressive secular government headed by Mohammed Mossadegh, who in his short time in political office enacted many social reforms and also nationalized the foreign-owned oil interests, namely the Anglo-Iranian Oil company (now BP). In a not uncommon post World War II geopolitical maneuver, Mossadegh was overthrown in a coup engineered by the US and Britain in 1953. He was quickly replaced by the Shah who proved to be a reliable pro-Western ally. Just as under the Mubarak regime, the institutions of civil society in Iran were systematically repressed, leaving the mosque as the main social space in which the seeds of opposition could be sown.
As an organization, the Muslim Brotherhood was born in an era of turbulent Egyptian nationalism and calls for independence in the first few decades of the twentieth century. After several failed experiments at liberal democracy, for the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist organizations, the return to the traditional ethos of the Islamic faith was a means of redemption. The idea was that Egypt as a nation could only move forward and progress by returning to the glory days when the Islamic faith had the strength to spread its message from the deserts of Arabia to the Iberian Peninsula. This sort of historical revisionism and romanticism of the past can have dangerous implications for any ideology. The Muslim Brotherhood, however, has publicly renounced violence and expansionism in the name of Islam for decades now in Egypt, yet the organization remains the ruling party’s chief opposition. Historian and author Arthur Goldschmidt Jr. argues that the Muslim Brotherhood’s fundamental values had a historically valid point in that, “Thought best known for their attacks against Christians and Jews, as well as… motion pictures, bars, modern female fashions and other ‘Western innovations’… they were reacting against a century (or more) of westernizing reforms that had brought little benefit and much harm to the average Egyptian”. Any thorough and honest study of history would conclude that reactionary elements in a given society do not simply appear out of nowhere.
There is no real consensus in Egypt of the Brotherhood’s intentions. The Mubarak regime takes seriously the Muslim Brotherhood, precisely because it is the largest opposition group in the country and maintains support amongst a broader cross-section of society than any other group. That is why the regime has arrested much more members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and for long periods of time. But allowing opposing opinions to fester quietly in private would only encourage otherwise moderate members to use violence as a tool to get their voices heard. The Brotherhood now maintains an uncompromising stance against violence, and cannot allow it to rear its ugly head again if reservations fail to be expressed.
In a relatively short span of time Islam has come from being associated with not only the religion, but also a violent political ideology. Islam has become politicized.
Human rights observers, Middle East correspondents, have been warning of the consequences of political oppression on the hearts and minds of everyday people in Egypt and elsewhere in the region. Now these very same actors are telling the once indifferent and complacent world, “We told you so”. January 25th was Egypt’s historic moment, but the reality is that this is a fight that has been raging for years in many small and not so small ways.
Just as these massive demonstrations began to explode in Cairo, I was in the process of writing and re-writing about my experience living in Cairo. I had hoped that my experience as a young person in Egypt would provide those outside the country with a better understanding of the many layers and complexities that characterize modern Egypt.
For many of the young Egyptians whom I’ve met and established friendships with, the strength and pride in who they are (whether Coptic Christian or Muslim) never once conflicted with their genuine desires for dignity, freedom of expression, and a yearning to live a life of meaning and happiness. Outsiders often misunderstand the strength of religious faith in countries such as Egypt, and are often eager to associate it with fundamentalism. In the aftermath of the bombing at the Two Saints Church in Alexandria, Egyptians of all stripes came out with signs expressing the solidarity between Copts and Muslims. The phrase “We are all Egyptians” (Kullna Masree’een), not more than a month ago, began as a call for religious tolerance and has now served as a rallying cry against the Mubarak regime.
I remember seeing a photo taken in Tahrir square during the first days of the protests of a little Egyptian girl who was balancing on a skateboard while waving an Egyptian flag. I thought that this beautiful photo represented what this struggle was all about. This was about the younger generation having a voice for the first time in their lives. The future happiness and prosperity of Egyptians was reflected in this little girl’s proud face, beaming with all the hope and aspirations of the youth.
Yet this revolution is not about Islam, America, or Israel. This is about Egyptians, particularly the young who have known no other leader but Mubarak, taking back their country from the selfish and egotistical regime that has stifled the nation’s development and progress under the banner of ‘stability’ and ‘anti-terrorism’. This is not a battle of ideologies. The right to freedom and dignity is a genuine human right, one that is shared by both Democrats and Republicans in the U.S., and secularists and Islamists in Egypt. Many protesters in Egypt neither identify as Islamist or secular, but they believe that only a fundamental change in the government structure can make Egypt a healthier and more prosperous place for all Egyptians.
As a young man who, as a resident foreigner in Egypt, has been harassed countless times by the country’s secret police force on the streets of Cairo, I can say that it is the worst feeling in the world to walk outside day and night fearing the very people who are supposed to be protecting Egyptian citizens. I would ask these politicians and other skeptics to put themselves in others shoes, and see why the Egyptian people are angry. To see why people in the region are tired of suffering and watching the rest of the world pass them by. This revolution transcends the stifling class, sectarian, and political divide in Egypt.
This is our moment to stand behind the Egyptian people and democracy and human rights. Because if this revolution fails, then it will create an environment ripe for fundamentalism and terrorism the likes of which we have never seen before. Indeed, extremist groups have been saying for years that the Western world is hypocritical and not interested in real democracy in the Middle East. When some in our media and government care more about the threat to Israel than the lives of 80 million Egyptians, then this sends the worst possible message to those who are fighting and dying in the streets of Cairo for even a taste of what we have here in the West. When conservative American politicians express cynicism towards these “Arab revolts” or outright urge that Mubarak stay in power in the interest of regional stability, then we can forget about our credibility as a nation that once stood up for the oppressed.
Let us shed our cynicism and stand for a better world...